Football One-Stop

Evaluating Wang Gang's Season Ratings at Beijing Guoan.

Updated:2025-12-11 08:04    Views:130

**Evaluating Wang Gang's Season Ratings at Beijing Guoan**

**Introduction**

At Beijing Guoan, the team's season ratings system evaluates a player's performance across three key categories: form, goal contribution, and goal difference. Each category is weighted differently, with form receiving the highest priority, followed by goal contribution, and then goal difference. This system aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of a player's contribution to the team.

**The Rating System: A Comprehensive Approach**

The rating system at Beijing Guoan is designed to evaluate players based on three primary metrics: form, goal contribution, and goal difference. Form is weighted at 10%, goal contribution at 4%, and goal difference at 2%. This structure allows for a balanced evaluation, ensuring that both defensive and offensive contributions are considered.

**Wang Gang's Performance: An Analysis**

Wang Gang's season performance is a critical focus in this article. His overall rating is below average, indicating a need for improvement in his form and contribution.

- **Form**: Wang's form is only 20% (only one game with one goal),Chinese Super League Matches which is below the 50% threshold, suggesting a need for more defensive play.

- **Goal Contribution**: His contribution is also 20%, falling below the 50% threshold, indicating a lack of offensive contribution.

- **Goal Difference**: His average goal difference is -0.4, which is below the 0.5 threshold, showing a continuing downward trend.

**Conclusion**

The article concludes that while the system is fair, Wang Gang's performance, particularly in form and goal contribution, is below average. This highlights the need for adjustments to the rating system to better accommodate players with inconsistent performance. The system, while effective for players with strong form, may not be suitable for those with low contribution, emphasizing the importance of a balanced evaluation framework.